(INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT 1872 QN 51-75)
51. Which is relevant in Section 8?
a) Cause b) Occasion
c) Preparation d) All the above Ans:c
52. A is accused of murder of B by beating him whatever
is said or done by A or B or by standers at beating or so shortly
before or after it as to form part of transaction is a relevant fact
under section-
a) Section 6 b) Section 9
c) Section
12 d)
Section 8 Ans:a
53. Which of the following is not relevant under section 8 of Indian Evidence act?
a) Intention b) Occasion
54. Under section 8 of Evidence Act-
a) Preparation is relevant b) conduct is relevant
c) Motive is relevant d) All the above Ans:d
55. In which of these expert opinion is relevant?
a) Foreign law b) Finger prints
c)
Art
d) All the above Ans:d
56. Under section 7 of Indian Evidence act-
a) Identity is relevant b) Opportunity is relevant
c) Introductory is relevant d) Conduct is relevant Ans:b
57. Which of the following statement is not relevant in a case where A is tried for murder?
a) That A quarreled with dead person three days before incident
b) That A has purchased a knife one hour before incident
c) That A is a man of good character
d) That A is a man of bad character Ans:d
58. Under section 7 the following are relevant-
a) Occasion b) Cause & effect
c) Opportunity & state of things d) All the above Ans:d
59. Under section 8 the following are relevant
a) Motive b) Preparation
c) Previous conduct d) Subsequent conduct
e) All the
above
Ans:e)
60. Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction
a) Whether they occurred at the same time and place
b) Whether they occurred at the different time and place
c) Both the A & B
d) Neither A nor B Ans:c(6)
61. Which of the following statement is not correct?
a) No fact of which the court will take notice need be proved
b) The facts admitted need not be proved
c) All the facts and contents of documents
d) Oral evidence must be direct Ans:c
62. Section 56 of Indian evidence act-
a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant
d) All the
above
Ans:b
63. Section 57 of Indian evidence act-
a) Fact of which the court must take judicial notice
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
c) In criminal cases previous good character relevant
d) All the
above
Ans:a
64. Fact admitted need not be proved according to
a) Section 55 b) Section 56
c) Section 57 d) Section 58
65. Under section 57(1) of Indian Evidence act, court shall take judicial notice of-
a) All laws in force in India
b) All laws including foreign law
c) All Indian and Asian law
d) All Indian and British laws up to 1950 Ans:a
66. Court will take judicial notice of the following -
a) All laws in force in territory of India
b) The
accession to office names, titles, functions and signatures of the
persons filling for the time being any public office in any state if the
fact of their appointment to such office is notified in any official
gazette.
c) The commencement continuance and termination of hostilities between the Government of India and any other state or body
d) All the above Ans:d
67. Of which of following fact the court will not take judicial notice?
a) Common law of Britain
b) Law of state of Indian
c) Division of time
d) Local general customs and tradition of India Ans:d
68. Fact which need not be proved explained in ______of Indian evidence act.
a) Part II, Chapter III b) Part II, Chapter IV
c) Part III, Chapter II d) Part IV, Chapter V Ans:a
69 Judicial notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic destinations, can be taken by court
a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:b(57)
70. Implied admission in
written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn. However, the
plaintiff can be insisted upon to prove his case
a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan.
b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:a(58)
71. The conduct of an eye
witness in non disclosing the incident to anybody for a number of days.
In highly unnatural on and is sufficient to reject testimony
a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Ganpat Kndiba Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra
d) None of these Ans:c(8)
72. Role of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to connect accused to the alleged incident.
a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:a(8)
73. When motive is not sine qua non for proving the prosecution case
a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
d) None of these Ans:c(57)
74. Which is not main principle that underlies law of evidence?
a) The evidence must be confined to matter in issue
b) Hearsay evidence must be admitted
c) Hearsay evidence must be admitted
d) The best evidence must be given cases Ans:c
75. Section 59 of Indian Evidence Act is-
a) Proof of facts by oral evidence b) Secondary evidence
b) Oral
evidence must be direct d) Proof of
contents of
documents Ans:a(59)
(Prepared by AB Kantharaja, Mobile 08969822340, http://abkantharaja.blogspot.in)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hmmmmm... what are you thinking? Do not forget to comment,It helps us to improve this blog and help us to make better. on