സ്ത്രീകള്‍ എങ്ങിനെ വസ്ത്രം ധരിക്കണം എന്ന് പുരുഷന്‍ നിഷ്ക്കര്‍ഷിക്കുന്നത് ശരിയോ? അല്ലെങ്കില്‍ തിരിച്ചും?

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Result of LGOs Examination held on 16-10-2011 in respect of Kerala Circle.

ANNEXURE-I
LIST OF CANDIDATES QUALIFIED IN THE 
LIMITED DEPARTMENTAL COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION
OF LOWER GRADE OFFICIALS FOR PROMOTION TO THE CADRE OF
POSTAL ASSISTANTS /SORTING ASSISTANTS HELD ON 16-10-2011



Name of
Division

Sl
No

Name of Candidate




Whether
SC/ST

Roll No
Category to which selected
TVPM (South)
1
Rajeev.S
-
2130000020
UR
2
S.Biju Kumar
-
2130000022
UR
TVPM (North)
1
Anusha Raj.B.S
-
2130000029
UR
2
Ramachandran Pillai.D
-
2130000072
UR
3
Anil Kumar.S
-
2130000024
UR
4
Anil Kumar.P
-
2130000025
UR
5
Gopakumar.R
-
2130000028
UR
6
Haji.S
SC
2130000071
SC
Kollam
1
B.Sreejith
-
2130000077
UR
2

SINDHU.P.M

-
2130000076
UR
Pathanamthitta
1

HARI KUMAR.V

-
2130000060
UR
2

PRESANNAKUMARI.P.R

-
2130000057
UR
3

PRESANNAKUMARY.S

-
2130000063
UR
4

THOMAS BABY

-
2130000062
UR
Tiruvalla
1

RAMESH.P.S

-
2130000011
UR
2

SURESH KUMAR.R

-
2130000009
UR
Mavelikara
1

SINDHU.B.KURUP

-
2130000086
UR
2

N.AJISH

-
2130000085
UR
3

T.C.SOMARAJAN 

SC
2129000101
UR
Alappuzha
1

V.KRISHNA KUMAR

-
2129000118
UR
2

DEVADASAN.M.K

-
2129000119
UR
Changanacherry
1

UMMERKUTTY.P.M

-
2129000047
UR
Kottayam
1

AMBILI THANKAPPAN

-
2129000115
UR
2

K.N.SASIKUMAR

-
2129000113
UR
3

P.T.THOMAS

-
2129000116
UR
Idukki
1

P.K.ROY

-
2129000013
UR
Ernakulam
1

A.R.ROSHIMA

-
2129000084
UR
2

K.B.JISHY

-
2129000083
UR
3

M.R.VINODINI

-
2129000131
UR
4

K.V.BABY

SC
2129000099
SC
Lakshadweep

NONE QUALIFIED




Aluva
1

RAJENDRAN.R

-
2129000108
UR
2

RAJESH.N.R

-
2129000023
UR
Irinjalakuda
1

K.M.THOMAS *

-
2130000082
UR
2

P.P.VANAJAKUMARI


-
2129000032
UR
Thrissur
1

RIJI.K.G

-
2129000056
UR
2

JAYASREE.P

-
2129000052
UR
3

SUBHADRA.M

-
2129000057
UR
4

VALSALA.E.V

-
2129000058
UR
Palakkad
1

SATHEESH.M (APS)

-
2112000177
UR
2

MUTHUKRISHNAN.C

-
2129000011
UR
3

VENKATASUBRAMANIA.R

-
2129000010
UR
Ottappalam
1

SMITHAMURALI

-
2128000059
UR
Manjeri
1

A.S.RADHAKRISHNAN

-
2128000009
UR
2

ACHUTHAN.C

-
2128000013
UR
3

RAJU.K

-
2107000075
UR
Tirur
1

PREETHA.E.V

-
2129000009
UR

2

SIVARAMAN.C.T. KATTAYATH

-
2128000002
UR
Calicut
1

BIJU P.K.

-
2128000041
UR
2

ABRAHAM P.K.

-
2128000050
UR
3

JAYARAM.R

-
2128000049
UR
4

UMA SANKAR GIRI

-
2128000043
UR

Vadakara
1

PRADEEP KUMAR.K

-
2128000079
UR
2

HARIDASAN.M.P

-
2128000077
UR
Thalassery
1

SUNIL.P.P

-
2128000026
UR
2

SIVADASAN.P.V

-
2128000031
UR
3

FRANCIS.E.M

-
2128000032
UR
Kannur
1

MANI.K.V

-
2128000067
UR
2

SREEJITH.K.M

-
2128000070
UR
3

P.S.THANKACHAN

-
2109000101
UR
Kasaragod
1

JAYARAJAN.M

-
2128000024
UR
RMS ‘TV’

NONE QUALIFIED

-


RMS ‘EK’
1

V.N.PRASAD

-
3129000011
UR
2

P.R.VIJAYAKUMAR

-
3129000009
UR
3

T.V.SATHIAN

-
3129000013
UR
4

APPUKKUTTAN.P.K

SC
3129000008
UR
RMS ‘CT’
1

BABURAJAN.K

-
3128000011
UR
2

KRISHNAKUMAR.E

SC
3128000019
UR
3

PURUSHOTHAMAN.P

-
3128000014
UR
4

V.BALAN

SC
3128000025
UR
5

B.ANILKUMAR

-
3128000007
UR

·         The promotion of Shri.K.M.Thomas, Irinjalakuda Division is subjectto the outcome of the WP (C) pending before the Hon’ble High Court.




Contd……/



LIST OF SURPLUS QUALIFIED CANDIDATE





Name of
Division

Sl
No

Name of Candidate




Whe-
ther
SC/ST

Roll No
Category to which selected
Division to which allotted
RMS ‘CT’
1
M.Balakrishnan
SC
3128000022
SC
RMS ‘TV”
RMS ‘CT’
2
C.K.Krishnan
SC
3128000034
SC
RMS’TV’
Aluva
3
Beena.S
-
2129000024
PH
(OH)
Irinjalakuda





(Rameshacharya)
Assistant Director (Rectt


Download : Result of LGOs Examination held on 16-10-2011 in respect of Kerala Circle.

Source : http://indiapost.gov.in/
-------------------------------------------
Related Post:

Eye-controlled Mouse System for computer system


A Swedish company called Tobii had launched a  eye-control device dubbed PCEye. The firm's invention tracks movement of a user's eyes and coverts it into mouse cursor on the screen.  According to Tobii, the device is connected through a USB. It is compatible with a large number of software.
Whats the theme behind this innovation ?
The company's main goal was to create a device that would improve the interactivity for stroke victims and other people suffering from impaired motor skills.
   Tobii's representatives also mentioned that the device can work with displays that have a diagonal ranging from 15 to 20-inches. The optimal distance at which the invention can operate ranges from 19.7 - 31.5-inches (50 - 80 cm).

   It is worth mentioning that in order to work properly the device should be connected to a computer that has at least a 1GHz dual-core processor.

   The advanced algorithms developed by Tobii specialists, in combination with high-res cameras can track and register the eye movement of about 95 percent of people. PCEye works perfectly in different light conditions and irrespective of the user's eye color.

   The company mentioned that the price of a PCEye system varies depending on the selected package. However, it was said that a standard option will have a price tag of $7000.

   Though this technology has been launched in the last year itself, many of us are not aware of  this technology.   Hope you have enjoyed reading this article:)

Courtesy : http://dheeru24k.blogspot.in
------------------------------
Related Post:

How to create table in Microsoft word without using Table property How to create table in Microsoft word without using table property




Method

You can create table in  word  without using  table properties    You  simply  use  + and – sign   like following way  

  +-------------------+--------------------------------+  then  press enter button

Eg : +--------------------------------+ press enter

  Result




If you want more column  then  add  + button
+------------------------------------+------------------------+ 
 result



thanks to - S Jayachandran -9961464279
-----------------------------
Related Post:

Friday, February 10, 2012

Special Recruitment Drive for Backlog Vacancies in SC and OBC Quota

IMPLEMENTATION OF REDESIGNED NETWORK FOR FIRST CLASS MAIL.

IMPLEMENTATION OF REDESIGNED
NETWORK FOR FIRST CLASS MAIL.
Sub: Implementation of Redesigned Network for First Class Mail.
D.G. Posts No.30-7/2012-D Dated 01-02-2012
The matter relating to restructuring the existing operational network and processing arrangements for First Class mail (Unregistered and Registered) was under consideration at this Directorate as part of the Mail Network Optimization Project. The issue has been examined in detail, and in this context following instructions are issued.
2. Under the new operational arrangements, the existing mail offices have been classified into Level 1 (L-1) and Level 2 (L-2) mail offices. There would be 89 L-1 and 244 L-2 mail offices under the new set up. The list of L-1 and L-2 mail offices for First Class unregistered mail is given as Annexure I. The list of L-1 and L-2 mail offices for Registered mail is given as Annexure II.
3. The manner of closing of bags between mail offices (handling unregistered and registered mail) would be as follows:-
(a) All L-1 mail offices will close direct bags for each other. An L-1 office will also close bags for all L-2 offices as well as delivery post offices mapped/attached to it.
(b) All L-2 offices attached/mapped to it an L-1 office can close bags for that particular office. An L-2 office may also close bags for all other L-2 offices mapped to the same L-1 office if the need be. It will also close bags for all delivery post offices mapped to it.
( c) An L-2 mail office would not close bags for any other L-1 office to which it is not mapped. Similarly an L-2 office will not close bags for any other L-2 office which is not mapped to the same L-1 office. However, there may be a situation where an L-2 office may require closing bags for an L-1 or L-2 office falling in the same circle or neighbouring circle for transmission advantage. Circles should try to keep this number to the bare minimum to the extent possible. In all such exceptional cases, the circle concerned should furnish the list of such offices and destinations for which bag closing is required and seek approval of the Directorate.
4. A sorting extract based on PIN range for both unregistered and registered mail has been prepared for the purpose of sorting at the mail offices under the new arrangement and the same is being communicated by e-mail to the Circles. The same may be brought to the notice of all concerned. The information on mapping of all delivery post offices to their parent mail offices is also being provided by e-mail.
5. In case of metro cities such as Mumbai and Chennai, where more than one mail office are handling unregistered mail, such offices would continue to function as inward/outward /surface/air segments of the L-1 offices as the case may be. Bags for these cities will be closed based on the mode of transport through which they are routed by other L-1 or L-2 offices (air or surface)
6. Post Offices would prepare two kinds of bags (separate for unregistered and registered mail) for their parent mail office (L-1 or L-2 as the case may be), which would be as follows.
(a) A bag containing TD mail to be delivered by post offices mapped to the same parent mail office (for unregistered mail)
(b) A bag containing non-TD (NTD) i.e. all mail other than TD , to be delivered by post offices not mapped to the same parent mail office (for unregistered mail)
( c) A bag containing TD mail to be delivered by the post offices mapped to the same parent mail office ( for registered mail).
(d) A bag containing non-TD (NTD) mail, i.e. all mail other than TD, to be delivered by post offices no mapped to the same parent mail office (for registered mail)
(e) Post Offices would continue to retain station article i.e. articles to be delivered from the same post office in case of both unregistered and registered articles.
6. The bags to be closed between L-1 offices, between an L-1 office and L-2 offices mapped to it and vice versa, and between L-1/L-2 offices and post offices mapped to them and vice versa will be treated as “Due Bags” . The issue would be reviewed after a month of implementation of the redesigned network and changes will be done, if necessary, based on the mail volume.
7. The sorting cases and diagram at L-1 mail offices may be reorganized as follows:-
(a) Type I (For sorting of inbound TD and Local TD mail) : Preliminary and secondary level selections should be provided for (i) inbound/incoming mail received from other L-1 offices and meant for delivery post offices andL-2 mail offices mapped to the L-1 office and (ii) Local TD ( including catchment area of the L-1 office) mail received from all post offices mapped to the L-1 and to be delivered by the delivery post offices mapped to the L-1 office
(b) Type II (Non TD) Preliminary and secondary level selections should be provided for outbound /non-TD mail received from attached post offices and L-2 mail offices of the L-1 office and meant for other L-1 offices as well as L-2 mail offices mapped to the L-1 office under reference.
8. The sorting cases and diagram at L-2 mail offices may be reorganized as follows :
(a) Type I (Inbound TD and Local TD) : Preliminary and secondary level selections should be provided for (i) inbound/incoming mail received from parent L-1 office to which the L-2 office is mapped as well as other designated L-2 offices, and meant for delivery post offices mapped to the L-2 officer and (ii) Local TD (including catchment area of the L-2 office) mail received from all post offices mapped to the L-2 and to be delivered by the delivery post offices mapped to the L-2 office.
(b) Type II (Non –TD) Preliminary and secondary level selections should be provided for (i) inbound/non- TD received from attached post offices of the L-2 office and meant for other L-1 and L-2 offices.
(c) At some L-2 mail offices, there could be a situation where only one type of sorting case/diagram is sufficient to incorporate all selections in terms of local TD, inbound TD and non –TD mail . In such cases, only one type of sorting case/diagram should be used.
9. The sorting logic/diagram for Type I and II sorting cases described in para 8 above should be redesigned by each mail office based on the average mail volume for various destinations (mail offices and post offices, as the case may be). The destination with relatively higher mail volume should be kept for sorting under preliminary selection. The Circle may note that all mail offices under the new set up are expected to complete sorting for all destinations under two-stage sorting, and therefore, it is important to keep the exceptions mentioned in para 3 (c)above to the bare minimum.
10. The existing arrangement for bag closing at Business Post Centres (BPCs) and Mail Business Centres (MBCs) handling outward bulk mail would continue for the time being. Instructions in this regard would be issued separately at the later date.
11. The new operational network would come into effect from 15th February, 2012. All Circles and APS Directorate may complete action required to migrate to the new network by 14th February, 2012.
Receipt of this memo may be acknowledged to Shri M.B.Gajbhiye, ADG (MO) Room No. 337, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001.
Sd/-
(Rishikesh)
Director (Mail Management)

Minutes of the Meeting of the Postmen Committee held on 25.01.2012

Click here to view - Minute of the meeting - No. 09-01/2005-WS-I/PE.I dated  07.02.2012

Mobiles can affect pacemakers: DoT

NEW DELHI: People with medical implants like pacemakers must not keep their cellphones on their shirt pockets. 

The latest directive by the department of telecommunication (DoT) says that "people having active medical implants should preferably keep the cellphone at least 15cm away from the implant." 

An office memorandum, circulated by the ministry of communications and IT on January 25, says manufacturer's mobile handset booklets will have to contain the safety precaution. 


MoS for communications and IT Sachin Pilot said this was one of the recommendations made by the inter-ministerial committee that the DoT has accepted. 

"Necessary changes in the design and packaging for compliance with this instruction will have to be in place on or before September 1," Pilot told TOI. 

Senior cardiologist at Escorts Heart Research Centre Dr Aparna Jaswal said it is safe for patients with implants to talk on a cellphone, but they must avoid placing it directly over the pacemaker implantation site when the device is turned on. 

"The pacemaker could misinterpret the cellphone signal as a heartbeat and withhold pacing, producing symptoms such as sudden fatigue. The mobile phone must be kept six inches away from pacemaker site and the patient must talk on the phone from the other ear and not the one close to the site," Dr Jaswal said. 

India has over 900 million cellphone users. 

According to the US FDA, radio frequency energy (RF) from cellphones can interact with pacemakers which are called electromagnetic interference (EMI). If EMI were to occur, it could affect a pacemaker in one of three ways: stopping the device from delivering the stimulating pulses that regulate the heart's rhythm, cause it to deliver the pulses irregularly or cause the implant to ignore the heart's own rhythm and deliver pulses at a fixed rate. 

Pilot suggested that it would be mandatory for all mobile phone manufacturers to warn patients about keeping their cellphones away from implants, besides some other safety messages. 

The memorandum circulated by the ministry says cellphone manufacturers must mention the following: use wireless and hands free systems like headphones with a low power blue tooth emitter, make sure the cellphone has a low Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), keep your calls short or send a text message instead. This advice applies especially to children, adolescents and pregnant women. "Use cellphone when the signal quality is good," the note says. 

The rate at which RF energy is absorbed by the body is called SAR. According to Pilot, the recommendations accepted include, "SAR level for mobile handset shall be limited to 1.6 watt/Kg, averaged over a mass of one gram of human tissue, SAR levels have to be displayed on the handset, all cell phones will have to comply with BIS standards and shall come with hands free services with the manufacturers providing a self declaration of SAR value of the handset." 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) had recently said talking on cellphone could cause a malignant form of brain Cancerclassifying radiation emanating from mobile phones alongside gasoline engine exhaust, lead and DDT as "possibly carcinogenic to humans". 

It said, "The WHO/IARC has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use." 

Pilot said, "We are not going to compromise with radiation limits since it has health-related concerns. The department of telecommunications set-up an Inter Ministerial Group in August, 2010, to evaluate the evidence, revisit radiation guidelines for mobile towers and adopt guidelines for radiation emission by cellphones. This group has recommended radiation limits more stringent than that of the United Nations." 

He added, "We had called for self certification of all mobile towers."

Release of Revised MNOP Script ( dtd 08/02/2012 )



Release of Revised MNOP Script
It is decided to keep both POS and SpeedNet MNOP Updation Script at a single point download. This script has to be used at all the offices using POS and SpeedNet.
Based on the latest Sorting Extract / Orders received from the Directorate and IC Hub Data received from Circles, the Revised MNOP Script is released and the details of the releases are as follows.
This script will contain the entire Hub Master data as per the requirement /modifications - including all the previous revisions. This document shows only the latest revisions.
Source & Download
ftp://ftp.ptcinfo.org/MNOP_Hubs_UpdationScripts_POS_SpeedNet/