The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has raised objections
to the cadre restructuring proposal of the Central Board of Excise and
Customs (CBEC), delaying a resolution to the acute manpower crisis
affecting the indirect tax administration, which is struggling to
collect 20% more revenue from central excise, customs and service tax
this year from a year ago. CBEC has a revenue target of Rs 5.6 lakh
crore this fiscal, 46% of the Centre's gross tax revenue.
The annual growth in indirect tax collections has come down sharply
since 2011-12. It is reckoned that in addition to the economic slowdown,
the CBEC's human resource crunch has also hit the collection drive.
CBEC's demand for more secretary-level posts and field officers to
bolster its revenue collection drive is now likely to be referred to a
committee of secretaries or to a group of ministers for further review
instead of being placed before the cabinet for approval as expected
earlier.
With 68,000 personnel at different levels, CBEC has only two thirds
of its sanctioned strength at present. The tax research unit (TRU), a
vital part of the CBEC, has about 12 vacancies at the moment. Officers
said vacancies that arise from retirement are not being filled because
the cadre recast proposal aimed at adding another 20,000 personnel was
under consideration.
“To meet the fiscal deficit target, it is desirable to raise revenue,
not cut productive expenditure. If revenue collection lags, public
borrowing goes up,” said a person familiar with the development. The
Centre will borrow Rs 4.84 lakh crore (net) this fiscal.
What has triggered a review is DoPT's questions on the proposal to
promote non-IRS officers at the fag end of their career to IRS rank.
CBEC had suggested creating about 4,000 temporary assistant
commissioner-level posts to be filled by way of promoting group B
(non-IRS) officers from the rank below.
Sources told FE that DoPT has pushed for creating more temporary AC
posts to be filled through promotions will distort the government of
India service rule that 50:50 ratio has to be maintained between
directly recruited IRS officers (through the UPSC) and officers promoted
from the cadre below.
The proposal was made by the Sixth Pay Commission heeding to the
demands of group B non-IRS officers such as superintendents who join the
service as inspectors but get only one promotion in their long careers.
To avoid stagnation, they wanted the chance to retire as an IRS officer
at the level of assistant commissioner.
“If we do not go ahead with the proposal, promotions from group B to
group A will get affected. It will affect the aspirations of our group B
officers. It is a ticklish issue that has cropped up now. If it goes to
a group of ministers, a decision might take longer,” said an official
privy to the development, who also held the DoPT’s view as a valid one
needing careful handling.
The development is set to delay further the cadre restructuring of
CBEC in the wake of the forthcoming national polls ahead of which a
model code of conduct will limit the government’s ability to finalise
and implement it.
Cadre restructuring proposal for the income tax department has
already been notified and delays in the same for CBEC has put the
indirect tax administration at a disadvantage. Sources said chief
commissioners in the I-T department in large zones are designated as
special secretaries now, unlike their counterparts in CBEC.
Also, unlike in the case of CBDT cadre recast, the Cabinet
Secretariat had demanded an assurance from CBEC that it would meet the
revenue targets for the year. Many field officers believe linking
revenue collection performance with the cadre review was unfair. They
also point out that senior officials in CBEC get secretary rank after
putting in many more years in service than their counterparts in other
central services.
Source : Financial Express
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hmmmmm... what are you thinking? Do not forget to comment,It helps us to improve this blog and help us to make better. on